What Are VP9 and AV1?
Learn how VP9 and AV1 video codecs compare to H.264 and H.265, where they appear online, and when they matter for your exports.
Streaming sites buffer less on slow Wi-Fi than they did five years ago. Part of that is VP9 and AV1, codecs tuned for internet delivery rather than Blu-ray discs.
Why new codecs keep appearing
Each codec generation tries to pack the same visible quality into fewer bits. Fewer bits means lower CDN bills and smoother playback on phones.
H.264 and H.265 come from the ITU/MPEG world. VP9 (Google) and AV1 (Alliance for Open Media) aim for open, royalty-free use on the web. Patents and licensing shaped which sites adopted which format.
For your desk, the question is simpler: can you encode fast, play everywhere, and hit the size cap? Often that means H.264 or HEVC in MP4, not AV1, unless you control the whole pipeline. Creator uploads still benefit from optimize video for YouTube on Mac even when the platform transcodes again.
Royalty-free codecs matter to billion-stream platforms, not to a designer emailing a 20 MB clip. Your bottleneck is usually compatibility and encode time, not patent pools.
VP9 basics
VP9 launched as a successor to VP8. YouTube served billions of VP9 streams before AV1 rollout accelerated.
Traits:
- Better compression than H.264 at similar bitrates.
- Common inside WebM containers on the web.
- Hardware decode on many Android phones and recent desktops, but uneven in older corporate laptops.
Creators rarely export VP9 from Final Cut or Premiere as a default delivery format. You consume VP9 more than you author it.
Adaptive streaming means the service picks VP9 or AV1 for you on the viewer side. Uploading H.264 does not prevent viewers from receiving a modern codec later.
AV1 basics
AV1 is the newer open codec from AOMedia members (browser and chip vendors). It targets another 30 percent or more savings over VP9 or HEVC at comparable quality, especially at low bitrates.
Traits:
- Excellent for streaming platforms that transcode once and serve millions.
- Encoding is slow on CPU without dedicated hardware.
- Decode support grew quickly on TVs, GPUs, and mobile chips from 2020 onward.
AV1 inside MP4 and WebM exists, but camera and screen recorder defaults still overwhelmingly ship H.264 or HEVC.
How they compare to H.264 and H.265
| Codec | Compression efficiency | Encode speed | Playback reach |
|---|---|---|---|
| H.264 | Baseline | Fast | Universal |
| H.265 (HEVC) | High | Medium with HW | Very good on modern devices |
| VP9 | High | Slow on CPU | Good in browsers, mixed offline |
| AV1 | Very high | Slowest without HW | Growing, not universal |
At 1080p, AV1 can look cleaner than H.264 at half the bitrate on hard content. At high bitrates for archiving, differences shrink.
See H.264 vs H.265 for the codecs you control in most export dialogs today.
At very low bitrates (under 1 Mbps at 720p), AV1 and VP9 shine on hard content. At delivery bitrates you would actually attach to email, H.264 tuned well is often good enough.
Where you already encounter VP9 and AV1
- Adaptive streaming on major video platforms (automatic quality ladders).
- WebM assets on sites optimizing for Chrome and Firefox.
- Some conferencing tools simulcast modern codecs to save bandwidth.
You do not pick AV1 when attaching an MP4 to email. The recipient player expects H.264 or HEVC.
Encoding time and hardware support
Software AV1 encodes can be 5 to 10 times slower than H.264 on the same machine for similar visual targets. Hardware encoders on recent GPUs and Apple Silicon improve that gap but require supported apps and drivers.
VP9 sits between H.265 and AV1 on speed. For a one-off bug clip due in five minutes, waiting on AV1 rarely makes sense.
Decode matters for clients: an AV1 file that looks great on your laptop may stutter on a 2015 conference room PC.
Test playback on the oldest machine in your audience before standardizing on AV1 for internal hosting. A stuttery all-hands recording wastes more time than a slightly larger H.264 file.
What to export for your own files
Practical defaults:
| Goal | Suggested export |
|---|---|
| Email, Slack, generic upload | H.264, 720p or 1080p, MP4 |
| Apple-centric team, modern hardware | HEVC in MOV or MP4 |
| Web archive you self-host with modern players | VP9 or AV1 in WebM if you tested playback; see optimize video for web on Mac |
| Master for editing | High bitrate H.264/HEVC or camera native |
Match bitrate guidance and platform limits such as YouTube upload size before chasing the newest codec. When a stakeholder cannot play HEVC, convert HEVC to H.264 on Mac is faster than experimenting with AV1 encode times.
Using GetCompress
GetCompress optimizes for codecs your recipients can play without thinking: H.264, HEVC, and common containers like MP4 and MOV. Compress locally, preview before export, set target file size, and batch folders. When streaming platforms re-encode to VP9 or AV1 anyway, a clean H.264 mezzanine upload is still the reliable creator workflow.
- Optimize Video for YouTube on MacOptimize video for YouTube on Mac with QuickTime and FFmpeg. Prepare a clean H.264 MP4 upload mezzanine without transferring an oversized editing master.
- Optimize Video for Web on MacOptimize video for the web on Mac with trim, resize, H.264 MP4, Fast Start, poster images, loading behavior, and real browser playback tests.
- H.264 vs H.265Compare H.264 (AVC) and H.265 (HEVC) for file size, quality, compatibility, and when to pick each codec for sharing video.
- YouTube upload limitsYouTube maximum file size, recommended upload settings, and how to compress long MP4 and MOV files before upload without visible quality loss.
Buy GetCompress now for local media compression with reusable presets and no media upload.